The prolonged struggle for financial independence and gender equality in academia and various other professions has persisted throughout history and continues to be relevant today. This struggle can be attributed to the deeply ingrained sexism and gender-based inequality that permeates society. The quest for women's financial autonomy has evolved alongside the rise of feminism, which emerged as a response to the lack of women's rights. English writer, Virginia Woolf, in her renowned 1931 talk entitled “Professions for Women”, pointed out that women's absence from historical narratives was not due to their lack of intelligence or talent but rather stemmed from their socio-economic constraints. Woolf emphasised that the unequal opportunities faced by women have detrimental effects on society as a whole. She urged women to challenge the societal expectations imposed upon them and reject the role of the self-sacrificing “angel in the house”. Therefore, this essay delves into the far-reaching economic implications of women's struggle for financial independence and equality, exploring its impact on women's participation and advancement in academia or any other profession.
One of the most notable obstacles to women's pursuit of financial independence is the enduring gender pay gap and economic disparity. The gender pay gap serves as an indicator of the discrepancy in the valuation of men's and women's contributions to the workforce. It is typically quantified as a percentage or a monetary difference that reflects the variance between the average earnings of women and men. The gender pay gap significantly impacts women's economic empowerment by impeding their financial independence and autonomy, causing long-term effects on their careers. When women are remunerated less than men for performing the same job, it curtails their opportunities for career progression and presents challenges in accessing higher-paying fields. Consequently, this establishes a vicious cycle of inequality that persists throughout their working lives. Furthermore, the gender pay gap can perpetuate a culture of sexism and discrimination within the workplace. Persistently lower wages for women reinforce the notion that their contributions are less valuable, thereby endorsing unequal treatment and a lack of respect. Accordingly, this can foster a hostile and demoralising work environment that detrimentally affects women's mental health and overall well-being. Therefore, addressing and rectifying the gender pay gap is not only crucial for achieving financial equality but also for cultivating a work environment that is inclusive and conducive to the overall success and welfare of women in their professional pursuits.
As Woolf suggests in her essay, “Intellectual freedom is dependent on material circumstances. Poetry relies on intellectual freedom. And women have always been impoverished, not merely for two hundred years, but since the dawn of time.” It becomes evident that financial independence is paramount for women in academia to sustain their livelihoods, despite the numerous hurdles they have historically encountered and continue to face in the workplace. The issue of the gender wage gap, in fact, traces back to the earliest days of civilisation. For instance, in Australia, women were granted a minimum wage set at 54% of men's wages in 1912. Significantly, the movement for equal pay gained political traction in the United States during the 1860s under the banner of "Equal Pay for Equal Work." Eventually, women secured the right to vote in the U.S. through the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution in 1920. These historical milestones epitomise the enduring struggle for financial independence and gender equality that women have faced throughout time.
Despite some progress, the gender wage gap persists in contemporary times, with disparities favouring men observed across every industry and occupation. On average, women earn only 79% of men's full-time salaries in 2019; and while the gender pay gap has shown a decline over the past decade, it has stagnated at 22.8% in the last two years in Australia. This deceleration is not limited to a particular region, as similar trends are observed globally. Despite women's pursuit of higher education, studies reveal that men's salaries see a greater increase (20%) with advanced degrees compared to women (16%). Additionally, women at research universities experience less favourable treatment in the labour market, and in Canadian universities, women professors earn 10% less than their male counterparts. These discrepancies stem from biases in determining salaries, differences in promotion rates, and the detrimental impact of parental and caregiving leave.
To address these challenges, it is crucial to combat biases, promote equal opportunities, and ensure fair compensation, fostering an inclusive and equitable professional landscape for all genders. Equal opportunities and fair treatment are key elements in their struggle for empowerment, encompassing aspects such as fair wages, access to career advancement, and recognition of their skills and contributions. To narrow the gender pay gap, policy responses are necessary. Equal pay legislation is a potential measure where governments can enact laws mandating employers to provide equal pay for equal work, promoting pay equity. Another strategy is pay transparency, enabling women to identify and challenge unequal pay practices. This can be achieved through requirements for employers to disclose pay information and gender breakdowns, or through voluntary transparency initiatives. In 2014, Australia implemented a formal gender equality policy that encompasses equity and diversity principles throughout the employment lifecycle, aimed at enhancing gender equality outcomes in the workplace. This policy framework establishes responsibility, accountability, and measurable gender equality objectives, resulting in a declining gender pay gap. Implementing suitable policies is essential in reducing the gender pay gap, thus improving women's financial independence and overall equality.
The essay endorses that women's limited presence in workplaces serves as a significant obstacle to achieving financial independence. Both men and women contribute unique aptitudes and viewpoints to the labour force, encompassing diverse approaches to risk assessment and collaborative endeavours. Research has also shown that companies with more gender-equal corporate boards tend to exhibit improved financial performance. Importantly, the link between women's sense of financial wellbeing and their agency over it, is grounded on their capacity to enter and thrive in the workplace. In her essay, Woolf asserts, "Lock up your libraries if you like; but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind." This quote underscores the demand for equal representation and the need to dismantle barriers that hinder women's access to education, knowledge, and opportunities. It emphasises the significance of enabling women to have an equal voice and presence in academia and other domains, advocating for increased female representation. Historically, the gender distribution in the U.S. has been approximately 50% for both males and females since at least 1860. However, without gender disparities, the representation of males and females in academia would align with the distribution of the general population. Despite notable progress in the accomplishments of women in academic careers, significant underrepresentation persists at the highest ranks of academia. For example, while 47% of medical students in the U.S. are females, only 12% of full professors in academic medicine are women. In 1995, a committee of MIT professors reported gender-based discrepancies in various aspects such as lab space allocation, salary distribution from research grants, teaching assignments, awards, inclusion on important committees, and departmental assignments. Thus, the underrepresentation of women across various professions is a critical catalyst to their struggle for financial autonomy.
Moreover, women often face workplace segregation and encounter difficulties in obtaining promotions, despite being equally capable as men. For instance, in the media industry, women represented a mere 19% of featured experts in news stories and 37% of reporters worldwide in 2015. Studies have shown that women CEOs, on average, had to work in a greater number of roles and industries and were four years older than their male counterparts before being promoted, reflecting the additional challenges women must overcome. Several factors contribute to the limited progress of women in the workplace, including discrimination or harassment based on sexual, ethnic, racial, or religious grounds, the prevailing culture within many workplaces, and the absence of family-friendly policies. Additionally, the scarcity of women in authoritative and high-status management positions perpetuates gender inequality within organisations. The increased inclusion of women in the scientific workforce is found to have positive implications. Research focused on gender ratios in work environments has indicated that achieving a 1:1 ratio of females to males leads to enhanced innovation, efficiency, and self-confidence in the workplace. Consequently, it is imperative for women to be accorded commensurate treatment with their male colleagues and to receive equitable access to the valuable opportunities they merit within the professional domain.
Therefore, effectively implementing measures to safeguard women's representation in the workplace serves as a crucial avenue for women to enhance their financial independence and achieve gender equality. In Australia, for instance, an online platform was launched to foster interactive dialogue on increasing women's representation in traditionally male-dominated industries. Additionally, a toolkit was developed based on global research and discussions with organisations in sectors such as mining, utilities, and construction, all committed to enhancing women's representation and leadership. The toolkit outlines leading practices from around the world to attract, recruit, retain, and develop women's skills in traditionally male-dominated fields. Moreover, the Australian Government's plan entails achieving a minimum representation of 40% for both women and men on public sector boards, a target successfully achieved in 2013. Furthermore, numerous studies accentuate the need for academic institutions to eliminate discriminatory practices that hinder women's decision-making in pursuing careers in academia. By addressing these systemic biases, organisations and institutions can create more inclusive environments and enhance opportunities for women's participation and advancement.
In conclusion, women's financial independence and equality are inextricably linked to their success in academia or any other profession. Virginia Woolf's work, A Room of One's Own, underlines the importance of financial freedom for intellectual freedom. Woolf famously stated, “A woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction.” This assertion underscores the crucial role of financial autonomy and personal space in enabling women to fully engage in their chosen endeavours. Without self-sufficiency, women may face barriers in pursuing their career aspirations and expressing their creativity. The essay emphasises that economic empowerment is an integral aspect of women's overall empowerment and significantly influences their position in society. It underlines the importance of financial resources, representation, and the dismantling of barriers in fostering women's agency, economic independence, and overall equality. Individuals must critically examine existing economic structures and envision a more inclusive and empowering economic landscape for women.
References
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499 Barbezat, D. A., & Hughes, J. W. (2005). Salary Structure Effects and the Gender Pay Gap in Academia. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 621–640. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40197439 Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2007). Working for the Woman? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 681–704. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25472487 Daugherty, G. (2021, February 15). The History of the Gender Wage Gap in America. Investopedia; Dotdash Meredith. https://www.investopedia.com/history-gender-wage-gapamerica-5074898 Developing a workplace gender equality policy. (2014). https://www.wgea.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/Characteristics-of-a-Gender-Equalitypolicy.pdf Equal Pay Day. (2009). Equal Pay Day - Pay Equity Timeline. Equalpayday.com.au. https://www.equalpayday.com.au/pay-equity Garg, N. (2012). Underrepresentation Of Females In Academia: A Relative Rate Index And System Dynamics Model. Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ymtdl/1718/ Haack, K. (2014). Breaking Barriers? Women’s Representation and Leadership at the United Nations. Global Governance, 20(1), 37–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24526180 How to promote gender equality in laws and policies in Australia? | Australian Human Rights Commission. (2014, June 11). Humanrights.gov.au. https://humanrights.gov.au/about/news/speeches/how-promote-gender-equality-laws-andpolicies-australia Irshad Ahmad Reshi, & Dr T. Sudha. (2023). THE GENDER PAY GAP AND ITS IMPACT ON WOMEN’S ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT. MORFAI JOURNAL, 3(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v3i1.742 Lagarde, C., & Ostry, J. D. (2018, November 28). Economic Gains from Gender Inclusion: Even Greater than You Thought. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2018/11/28/blogeconomic-gains-from-gender-inclusion-even-greater-than-you-thought Li, Y. (2019, April 16). Women still only earn 79% of what men are paid as wage gap persists. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/16/women-still-only-earn-79percent-of-what-men-earnadp-study-finds.html London Women’s Liberation Campaign for Legal and Financial Independence and Rights of Women. (1979). Disaggregation Now! Another Battle for Women’s Independence. Feminist Review, 2, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1394998 Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2014). Gender Pay Gap and Employment Sector: Sources of Earnings Disparities in the United States, 1970-2010. Demography, 51(5), 1597–1618. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43697475 ORR, E., & Stevenson, J. (n.d.). What Makes Women CEOs Different? Www.kornferry.com. https://www.kornferry.com/insights/this-week-in-leadership/women-ceo-insights Penner, M., & Smith-Carrier, T. (2022, June 9). Gender pay gap: It’s roughly half-a-million dollars for women professors across a lifetime. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/gender-pay-gap-its-roughly-half-a-million-dollars-for-womenprofessors-across-a-lifetime-183767#:~:text=Women%20professors%20earn%20on%20average Peterson, D. L., & Powers, T. (2019). Women as Drivers of Economic Growth. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 14, 176–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48573738 Rattan, A., Chilazi, S., Georgeac, O., & Bohnet, I. (2019, June 6). Tackling the Underrepresentation of Women in Media. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/06/tackling-the-underrepresentation-of-women-in-media The Wall Street Journal. (2019, March 5). How Virginia Woolf Decorated Her Room of One’s Own. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-virginia-woolf-decorated-her-room-of-one-s-own11551788812 Virginia Woolf - Mrs. Dalloway, To the Lighthouse, A Room of One’s Own and other major works. (n.d.). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/VirginiaWoolf/Mrs-Dalloway-To-the-Lighthouse-A-Room-of-Ones-Own-and-other-major-works Woolf, V. (2004). A room of one's own. Penguin. Workplace Gender Equality Agency. (2021). The Gender Pay Gap . Www.wgea.gov.au. https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap Workplace Gender Equality Agency. (2022). Gender Pay Gap Data | WGEA. Workplace Gender Equality Agency. https://www.wgea.gov.au/pay-and-gender/gender-pay-gap-data Yousaf, R., & Schmiede, R. (2017). Barriers to women’s representation in academic excellence and positions of power. Asian Journal of German and European Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40856-017-0013-6
コメント